The solution of the problem could be within the core. Some nuclei emit radiation and others do not. If you understand why there can be some way to manipulate the core.

In the nucleus there are protons and neutrons. For chemicals, protons are the most important; the chemistry of the atom depends on the number of protons, so the names of the elements were placed according to the number of protons they have in the nucleus of the atom. For example, any atom that has 7 protons is nitrogen, regardless of the neutrons it has. But for physicists the number of neutrons is also important. A nitrogen has 6 neutrons or 7 are very different. Both are nitrogen, but they are two isotopes, the 13 nitrogen and the 14 nitrogen, respectively (the element representing the isotopes and the number of particles of the nucleus, the protons plus the neutral ones is named). The first is radioactive and the second is fully stable. The difference is in the number of neutrons, which is important; in short, to know if a certain isotope is radioactive, you have to look at the proportion between protons and neutrons.

In order for the core to be stable, protons need neutrons and also in adequate quantity. Neither too many neutrons nor too few. But how much is that? How many neutrons does the nucleus need not to be radioactive by proton? There is no simple answer. In most small atoms the law of equality is fulfilled: how many protons, several neutrons.

Equality

The helium-4 core (2 protons, 2 neutrons) is a good example. Very stable. Moreover, the cores formed by several units of the helium-4 core are also very stable: 12 carbon (6 protons, 6 neutrons, 3 units), 16 oxygen (8 protons, 8 neutrons, 4 units), etc. There are exceptions, for example, the beryllium-8 core (two helium-4 units) is radioactive. However, in general, small nuclei with the same number of protons and neutrons are stable.

However, this trend ends with the calcium-40 nucleus. In larger atoms, the nucleus needs more neutrons than protons to stay stable. For example, the most abundant stable isotope of iron has 26 protons and 30 neutrons. It has 1.15 neutrons per proton. In the case of gold, this ratio is higher, as the only stable isotope is 79 protons and 118 neutrons. That is, to more heavy atom, greater proportion. In the case of bismuth, 83 protons and 126 neutrons, the ratio reaches number 1.52. In atoms larger than bismuth the situation is serious; there are many protons and you cannot put in the nucleus as many neutrons as to stabilize such a large number of protons.

Radioactive response

Radioactivity is the process of balancing leftover or missing neutrons. In both cases the process is very different. Particles and energy are emitted in both, but very differently.

When there are too many neutrons, the nucleus presents a difficult situation. The logical thing would be that neutrons were expelled from the nucleus, but it is almost impossible to expel a neutron without more, much energy is needed. Instead, the neutron disintegrates. Being a neutral particle, disintegration produces a positive and negative particle, a proton and an electron. (In addition, another particle and energy is released in this process.) The proton stays in the nucleus, so the atom becomes another atom by having one more proton; the isotope of carbon 14 (6 protons, 8 neutrons), for example, becomes 14 nitrogen (7 protons, 7 neutrons) by such a process. On the contrary, the electron is ejected with great energy. This radiation is called beta.

When neutrons are too low, the core uses another strategy to compensate for this lack: it emits alpha particles. Alpha particles consist of 2 protons and 2 neutrons, that is, they are helium nuclei 4. As already mentioned, they are very stable, so it does not take much energy to eject these units from the core. The nucleus loses two protons (it becomes a smaller atom) and thus somehow alleviates the need for neutrons. It doesn't need so much neutrons to stay stable. For example, the famous uranium-238 is transformed into thorium-234 by emitting an alpha particle.

Radioactivity of waste

Bismuth 209 minor atoms hardly emit alpha particles, usually heavy core radiation. In fact, elements related to waste issues in nuclear power plants emit alpha particles. An important example is the radio-226 isotope, a product of uranium fission. In this type of isotope, if radiation were treated, alpha particle emission should be treated.

We should accelerate. Thus, instead of emitting radiation for many years, it would run out in the shortest possible time. The isotope Radio-226 itself has an average life of 1,600 years. This means that at that time half of the amount of radio is disintegrated, and at the same time half of that half is disintegrated, that is, a quarter of the initial amount remains.

Think about how long to wait until the entire radio disintegrates. Therefore, the underground underground is not a good solution, as the problem persists 'forever', even if it is underground. And that's why physicists want to invent a process that accelerates this radioactivity. Instead of burying the problem would disintegrate. It is believed.

The world of electrons

Several proposals have been made to accelerate the emission of Alpha particles. Environments with many electrons have generated the most hope. The idea is simple: alpha particles have a positive charge because they have two protons (as the name suggests, neutrons are electrically neutral); if they are immersed in a medium with many electrons, the medium would "pull" alpha particles out of the core because electrons are negative charges. Therefore, this negative medium would accelerate the emission of alpha particles.

It is, of course, about finding a suitable environment. The last proposal was made by physicists from the Ruhr University of Germany. The Polonio-210 isotope is trapped inside a metal and its low temperature. The atomic network of metal is a medium full of electrons that cools so that atoms remain as slow as possible. In this way they have affected the radioactive isotope.

According to physicists, the results are positive. Now they want to try to do the same with the radio-226 isotope. This isotope has an average life of 1,600 years and, according to German physicists, can descend to about 100 years. And with more research, a shorter half-life can be achieved.

But not all physicists believe that. In the tests carried out by physicists of the University of Oxford they have not managed to shorten the average life. In addition, in short, this methodology should be adapted to nuclear power plants. If the isotope is forcefully refrigerated, it is difficult to start an efficient process, since cooling also requires a lot of energy.

The German proposal has generated a great debate between researchers and physics blogs. In short, radioactivity control could be a utopia.